EU-US Wine Agreement
On March 10, 2006, Commissioner Fischer-Boel
and Ambassador Portman
signed the
US-EU wine trade Agreement,
marking the end of a first phase in ongoing trade discussions, which began
in 1983. The Agreement addresses several key issues, and sets a framework to
facilitate future wine trade between the United States and Europe.
Both sides agreed to start a second-phase of the negotiations 90 days
after the entry into force of the agreement to address other outstanding
U.S.-EU wine trade issues.
Specifically, the Agreement covers
fermented grape beverages with an actual alcohol content of not less than 7
percent and not more than 22 percent by volume. It provides for :
 |
Mutual
acceptance of existing oenological (wine making) practices -
Since 1983, the European Union (EU) has extended short-term derogations,
temporarily accepting US wine making practices. This Agreement removes
the continuous uncertainty of these temporary derogations, providing more
stable market conditions for US wine exporters. The US continues to
accept current EU oenological practices, and agrees to follow a formalized
approval process for new wine making procedures (Article 4, Article 5 and
Annex I). |
 |
Certification : Under the terms of the
Agreement, the EU has simplified its import certification requirements for
US wine. All U.S. wine imports must be accompanied by certification
and analysis documentation using the format specified in Annex III (a)
to the Agreement. More information on the simplified EU import
certificate form can be obtained from the
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. With the mutual acceptance of wine making practices, the US will
exempt EU wine from new US certification requirements for imported wine
(Article 9 and Annex III). |
 |
Semi-generic names : The US agrees to
seek legislative changes to limit the use of 16 semi-generic names, as
well as retsina used on wine labels. The names covered by the
Agreement include: burgundy, chablis, champagne, chianti, claret, haute sauterne,
hock, madeira, malaga, marsala, moselle, port, retsina, rhine, sauterne,
sherry, and tokay (Article 6 and Annex II). Legislation changing the legal
status of these names was enacted by the Congress and singed by the
President on December 20, 2006, as section 422 of the Tax Relief and
Health Care Act of 2006. The new rules grandfather existing
uses of these semi-generic names, but prohibit new brands from using
these names on non-European wine. |
 |
Names of
Origin : The US and the EU agree to recognize certain of each
other's names of origin in specific ways. While this Agreement does not
address the broader issue of geographic indications (as this still remains
under the purview of the TRIPs Agreement), the US and the EU note that
"each Party's competent authorities shall take measures to ensure that any
wine not labeled in conformity with this Article is not placed on or is
withdrawn from the market until it is labeled in conformity with this
Article" (Article 7, Annex IV and Annex V).
Commission Regulation 1416/2006 lays down specific rules on the
implementation of Article 7 concerning the protection of U.S. names of
origin. |
 |
Labeling
: The Agreement addresses a number of additional labeling issues. Article
8 notes that "labels shall not contain false or misleading information in
particular as to character, composition or origin." More specifically,
the Protocol on Wine Labeling, sets specific conditions for the use of
names of vines, vintage characteristics, production methods, product types
and variety names. See also
GAIN
Report E36067 "EU Wine Labeling Requirements". |
|