July 30, 2001
Montana Crop Condition Update - July 2001
Summary:
Montana crops are in worse condition than seen in recent
years due to multi-year drought. Winter and spring wheat crops struggled through
germination and establishment due to very dry soils. Analysis of satellite
imagery and other information show that although there is greater vegetation this
year than last year in some areas of the state, such is not the case in the historically high crop producing counties.
Recent Rainfall:
Precipitation across Montana was well below normal during the first half of 2001.
This dry spell followed the very dry
2000
growing season. A precipitation graph for Hill Co., Montana shows rainfall
to be much
below normal from January through May across the high spring wheat producing counties of northern
Montana. A precipitation graph for Dawson Co., Montana illustrates how much drier this year is than last
year. While a statewide increase in precipitation in June and July 2001 helped halt the
deterioration of crop conditions, the earlier damage has resulted in poorer winter and spring grain conditions than in recent years.
Crop Conditions:
Crop development progress is ahead of the five-year average, and on par with
last year at this time, according to USDA's National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). As of July 22, NASS showed 98 percent of Montana's current spring wheat crop in the
heading or beyond stage, whereas last year on this date 92 percent of the
crop was headed. The five-year average is 90 percent. On July
22, 16 percent of Montana's winter wheat was harvested, according
to NASS. Last year on July 22, 15 percent was harvested; 6
percent is the five-year average. Spring wheat crop condition was
rated as 12 percent excellent, 34 percent good, 20 percent fair,
12 percent poor, and 22 percent very poor. Pastures and rangeland
in Montana were rated similarly as "poor." On July 22, NASS ratings
for pastures and rangeland were 5 percent excellent, 20 percent
good, 34 percent fair, 25 percent poor, and 16 percent very poor.
Imagery:
Slide 1 shows Vegetative Index
(VIN) maps from the first 15 days of July, comparing
2000 and 2001 vegetation. From the 2001 map it can be seen that
north central Montana has much less vegetation this year than last year. Historically, these are the high-producing wheat counties. Secondly, it is evident
that this year eastern Montana, particularly east central Montana
is greener than last year as of early July. However, spring wheat and winter wheat production maps illustrate
that east central Montana historically produces less wheat than the northern counties.
Slide 2 is a comparison of two
Landsat TM images from Hill Co., Montana, at the Fresno Reservoir. The images are from
July 2, 2001 and June 21, 2000. Water levels of
the reservoir are down this year compared to last. The
light red and pink fields on this year's image are poor condition
winter and spring wheat fields. The full bright red tones on last
year's image indicate the much better wheat condition a that time.
Slide 3 is a Landsat TM scene
from May 7, 2001, of Hill Co., Montana, showing an area from the
Fresno Reservoir to Havre. The pink fields are poorly established
winter wheat; the gray fields are recently worked fields,
mostly planted to spring wheat. The dark green fields are likely enrolled in the
Conservation Reserve Program, or are fields with last year's stubble. A few
of the winter wheat fields are labeled to help with crop
identification.
Slide 4 is a Landsat TM scene
from June 8, 2001, of Hill Co., Montana, showing the same area
from the Fresno Reservoir to Havre. The pink fields are poorly
established winter and spring wheat fields. Some of the better
winter wheat and spring wheat fields are brighter red, but they are few in
number. Again, a few of the winter wheat
and spring wheat fields are labeled to help with crop
identification.
Slide 5 is a Landsat TM scene
from July 2, 2001, of Hill Co., Montana, showing the same area
from the Fresno Reservoir to Havre. More red fields are now
visible, showing some improvement in crop condition. But crops
are still in poorer condition than recent years as evidenced by
the VIN comparisons (Slide 1)
and the year to year comparison (slide
2).
For more information, contact Carl Gernazio of the Production Estimates and Crop Assessment Division at 202-690-0136 or by e-mail at gernazio@fas.usda.gov.