Prices and Economic Indicators
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPLICATIONS The March global oilseed output estimate was nearly unchanged from the previous month, with gains in China about offsetting losses in Argentina and India. However, some weakness in Asian demand will push global oilseed ending stocks to 31 days of use, compared with last month's 30 day estimate. Most of the expected recovery in foreign oilseed stocks will be in South America. Never-the-less, world oilseed ending stocks are projected to continue significantly below their 10-year average as are U.S. soybean ending stocks.
This month's ending-stock estimates in days of total use for
1997/98 with comparisons and percentage differences from their
respective 10-year averages include:
ENDING STOCKS IN DAYS BY REGION & COMMODITY |
96/97 | FEB. EST. 97/98 | MAR EST. 97/98 | 10-YR. AV. | 97/98
% DEV. FM 10-YR. AV. |
| US SOYBEANS | 20 | 34 | 36 | 50 | - 29% |
| WORLD OILSEEDS | 23 | 30 | 31 | 38 | - 18% |
| US SOYBEAN OIL | 34 | 33 | 31 | 45 | - 32% |
| WORLD VEG. OILS | 34 | 31 | 30 | 40 | - 25% |
This month's upward revisions in the current ending stock use
coverage estimates from last month for U.S. soybeans and world
oilseeds point to slightly lower than previously expected soybean
and meal prices. Downward revisions in ending stock estimates for
U.S. soybean oil and world vegetable oils indicate higher prices
for most vegetable oils.
Outside the United States, the linkages between stocks and prices are much weaker than in the U.S. These differences may reflect the fact that the estimates for foreign stocks are less complete, less well known, and less reliable. Also, foreign producers' pricing power may vary depending upon stocking capacity and financial liquidity.
The global vegetable oil output forecast was revised upward by
0.33 million tons, reflecting gains in China and Indonesia and
the EU-15, partly offset by slight downward revisions in India,
Canada, Argentina and Thailand. However, strong demand is
expected to trim U.S., as well as world vegetable oil ending
stocks slightly below last month's forecasts and U.S. soybean oil
exports should exceed the previous forecast because: (1) foreign
vegetable oil supplies will expand by only 1.7 percent, or less
than half their 10-year average annual usage growth rate; (2)
foreign vegetable oil stocks are sharply below normal; (3)
vegetable oil demand is very inelastic to price changes; and (4)
China's expanding oil usage will overshadow the impact of slowing
economic growth in some other Asian countries.
Weakness in the new crop soybean/corn futures price ratio could
curb U.S. soybean plantings this spring in the corn belt. The
above average soybean/cotton price ratio could benefit soybeans
or corn. Recovery in vegetable oil prices relative to grain
should boost plantings of high-oil content oilseeds.
KEY INDICATORS February
indicators exceeding their respective 12-month trailing averages
include: feed profitability; the broiler feed price ratio;
soybean oil's share of product value; and U.S. soybean exports
and crush. Indicators falling short of their respective 12-month
trailing averages include: the soybean/corn price ratio; the
soybean/cotton price ratio; the meal/grain price ratio; U.S.
soybean oil stocks; the U.S. hog/corn ratio; U.S. soybean crush
margins; Malaysian palm oil stocks; U.S. soybean oil stocks; and
the value of the European Currency Unit (ECU) in U.S. dollars.
FEBRUARY 1998 PRICE SUMMARY
Cash prices for U.S. soybeans and corn showed counter seasonal
weakness, while soybean meal prices registered above-normal
weakness. In contrast, soybean oil prices, at a discount to palm
oil, showed counter seasonal strength. These prices, except for
soybean meal, remained significantly above their respective
monthly 10-year averages. Oil prices registered an above normal
seasonal gain in relation to meal. Relative strength in soybean
prices boosted the February soybean/corn price ratio slightly
above its 10-year average. The February 1998 index of prices
received for all U.S. farm products was 2 percent below the
previous month and 4 percent less than a year ago. Annual
percentage changes in February U.S. prices for selected
commodities include: palm oil, +15; soybean oil, +11; and corn,
-3; livestock & livestock products, -5; soybeans, -9; coconut
oil, -15; and 48-percent soybean meal, -25. February 1998 cash
prices for selected commodities were all below their respective
12-month averages, except for palm oil and soybean oil.
| FEBRUARY CASH PRICES
& PRICE RATIOS |
10-YR. HIGH |
10-YR. LOW | 10-YR.
AVG. |
FEB. 1998 |
| SOYBEANS, FARM ($/BU) | 7.41 |
5.40 | 6.22 | 6.63 |
| CORN, FARM ($/BU) | 3.37 | 1.83 | 2.46 | 2.50 |
| SOYBEAN/CORN PRICE RATIO | 3.26 | 2.08 | 2.57 | 2.65 |
| 48% SOY MEAL, DECATUR ($/ST) | 262 | 151 | 201 | 193 |
| SOY OIL, DECATUR (CENTS/LB) | 28.8 | 18.9 | 22.7 | 26.5 |
| 48% SOY MEAL/CORN PRICE RATIO | 3.05 | 1.90 | 2.32 | 2.16 |
| SOY OIL/MEAL PRICE RATIO | 3.72 | 1.68 | 2.34 | 2.75 |
In February 1998, U.S. corn, soybean and soybean oil prices each
exceeded its 10-year average for that month, while meal and the
meal/corn price ratio lagged.
Possible implications of the above changes:
*** Improved cash soybean/corn price ratios boosted Southern Hemisphere oilseed plantings in late 1997.
*** Lower grain prices could improve feed profitability and could boost livestock product output.
*** Lower meal prices in relation to grain, could boost meal feeding rates.
*** Above normal oil/meal and oil/grain price ratios may boost plantings of high-oil content crops this spring.
Key percent changes in February 1998 U.S. prices for selected
commodities are:
| PRICES & PRICE RATIOS | FEB. 98 % DEV. FM FEB. 10-YR. AV. |
FEB. 10-YR. AV. % DEV. FM 10-YR. OCT-SEP AV. |
FEB. 98 % OF CURRENT FORECAST |
FEB. 98 CHANGE FM PREVIOUS MONTH |
| SOYBEANS | +6.6% |
- 1.3% |
+2.0% |
- 0.9% |
| CORN | +1.8% | - 0.8% | - 2.0% | - 2.3% |
| SOYBEAN/CORN | +3.2% | - 0.7% | +3.9% | +1.5% |
| 48% SOY MEAL | - 3.9% | - 4.7% | - 1.1% | - 5.0% |
| SOYBEAN OIL | +16.7% | - 1.0% | +0.0% | +5.7% |
| SOY MEAL/CORN | - 6.9% | - 3.7% | +0.5% | - 2.7% |
| SOY OIL/MEAL | +17.5% | +4.0% | +1.1% | +11.2% |
SOYBEANS In
mid-February, U.S. farm prices for soybeans were slightly below
the previous month, but above the 10-year average for that month.
February soybean prices registered monthly declines in six out of
the last 10 years. In contrast, March prices during the same
years rose 90 percent of the time. Although the current price
forecast implies a counter seasonal decline in soybean prices in
coming months, U.S. ending stocks of soybeans are expected to be
29 percent below the 10-year average in days of use. Therefore,
this season's average soybean price should remain above its
10-year average.
Although U.S. soybean stocks on Sept 1, 1998 are expected to
remain below its 10-year average in days of use, the foreign
sector will begin 1998/99 with nearly four million tons more
carry-in, compared with this season's 3-million ton decline.
Unless U.S. oilseed yields in 1998 are significantly below-trend,
the stage is set for a significant increase in U.S. and global
oilseed stocks and lower prices in 1999. The historic inventory
soybean cycle which resulted in peak prices in 1993/94, 1988/89,
1983/84 and 1978/79 was disrupted by strong grain demand which
curbed foreign oilseed plantings in 1996/97. This cut soybean
stocks and boosted prices to the highest level since 1988/89. The
price increase triggered expansion in 1997 oilseed plantings and
output that could boost stocks and curb prices next year, unless
the "El Nino" is followed by a "La Nino"
which could adversely affect U.S. yields in 1998. However, prices
are likely to remain at above-average levels until above normal
stock levels are assured.
In February, producer prices were 21 percent below their May
1997 peak and 4 percent below their long-term trend. The chances
are two out of three that monthly soybean prices will remain
within one standard error, (plus or minus 13.8 percent) from the
trend. In February 1998, with the market in transition, the
November soybean futures were flat with farm prices. During the
past decade, November soybean futures averaged 3.8 percent over
the farm price for that month, but ranged between 5.6 percent
under in 1997 to 8.8 percent over in 1991.
CORN The mid-February,
U.S. producer price for corn was 2.3 percent below the previous
month, but remained 2 percent above its 10-year average for that
month. During the last 10 years, February corn prices registered
monthly increases 70 percent of time, compared with 90 percent of
the time in March. In February 1998, U.S. corn prices were 6
percent below a year earlier, reflecting some recovery in U.S.
ending stocks which could benefit feed profitability.
CROP PRICE RATIOS The
high soybean/corn price ratio that boosted South American oilseed
plantings nearly 10 percent faded to 2.27:1.0 based on March 10
new crop futures, or 11 percent below a year earlier and 14
percent below its long-term average. Although unchanged from a
year earlier, the soybeans/cotton price ratio is above average.
In the U.S. corn belt, producers may plant more corn. In the
cotton belt, the soybean/cotton price ratio favors soybeans, but
for some, corn may be a better alternative. The depressed
wheat/corn price ratio favors less wheat and more corn or
soybeans in the western corn belt. Higher vegetable oil price
will give a boost to sunflower and rapeseed plantings. This may
result in a slight increase in 1998 U.S. oilseed plantings,
following last year's 8 percent increase. However, adverse
weather could prevent timely corn plantings and further boost
soybean plantings. The first indication of U.S. 1998 crop
plantings will be issued on March 31.
FEED PROFITABILITY In
February, the U.S. feed profitability index was 6 percent above a
year earlier and at its highest level in 29 months. Since 1965,
the monthly changes in this index during February ranged between
-1.5 and +7.6 percent and averaged +1.6 percent. In February,
this index increased 3 percent despite lower livestock prices,
reflecting lower feed prices. With improving efficiency and
expanded farrowing, the hog/corn price has trended downward and
the February ratio, at 14.1:1, was only 9 percent above its
long-term low. In contrast, the broiler/feed price ratio in
February was 6 percent above a year earlier, while its 12-month
average gained 6 percent from a year earlier.
CRUSH MARGIN Despite
expanded 1997/98 U.S. supplies, the February 1998 soybean crush
margin dropped 28 percent from a year earlier to a-level 41
percent below its 12-month average. Larger supplies normally
result in improved margins. However, this season U.S. producers
have been reluctant to sell at prices significantly below last
year when a "La Nino" could follow the "El
Nino," bring dry weather and curb yields. Also, crushers
have been forced to bid more competitively for beans during a
period when reduced soybean stocks in South America and larger
purchases by China were boosting U.S. soybean exports. Despite
reduced margins, U.S. soybean processors' capacity utilization in
January rose to 88.2 percent, compared with 85.9 percent a year
earlier. U.S. crushers continue to expand capacity. However,
during the last decade, the 3-year average of U.S. soybean
production increased 23 percent, while U.S. soybean crush
capacity is estimated to have increased only 19 percent.
U.S. SOYBEAN DISAPPEARANCE
About 48 percent of the 290 million bushel increase in the
1997/98 U.S. soybean supply was used up during the first half of
the marketing year. By the end of February, U.S. soybean
disappearance (crush plus exports) using Census data plus
preliminary weekly data totaled 1,524 million bushels, or 140
million bushels more than the year earlier period. During
Sept-Feb 1997/98, the crush and export each increased 10 percent
from a year earlier to about 838 million bushels and 686 million
bushels, respectively. Current forecasts imply that the U.S.
soybean crush and exports will both slow sharply during Mar-Aug
1998.
SOYBEAN MEAL February
prices for U.S. 48-percent meal were 27 percent below a year
earlier and 15 percent below its long-term trend. The down swing
in meal prices, now 37 percent below the May 1997 peak, reflects
the expected surge in competing exports from South America, as
well as shrinking demand prospects in some Asian countries due to
currency devaluations. However, abundant U.S. soybean supplies
and lower than previously expected prices will boost U.S. soybean
meal exports significantly above the previous record of 6.6
million metric tons in 1986/87. Cumulative exports plus
outstanding export sales through February exceeded 6.3 million
tons or 66 percent more than a year earlier.
SOY MEAL/CORN PRICE RATIO Despite
some recovery in U.S. corn stocks and expanding meal exports, the
February 1998 U.S. soybean meal/corn ratio was 3 percent below
the previous month and 23 percent below a year earlier. During
the nine months ending February 1998, the U.S. soybean meal/corn
ratio dropped 32 percent to a level 13 percent below its
long-term average of 2.48:1. Reduced meal/grain price ratios
should boost meal feeding rates, feed profitability and finally
meal usage.
U.S. SOYBEAN MEAL USAGE & EXPORTS During the 12 months ending December 1987, U.S. soybean meal domestic disappearance, at 27.5 million short tons gained 2.1 percent, despite higher prices. With significantly lower prices expected for the Mar-Sep 1998, U.S. soybean meal usage expansion is expected to accelerate to 3.3 percent compared with only 1.6 percent growth during the same months a year earlier. Although domestic meal usage is benefitted by growing U.S. animal product exports, growing meal imports, largely rapeseed meal from Canada will approach 1.2 million tons, or 14 percent more than last year. In contrast, U.S. soybean meal exports which surged 38 percent during Oct-Dec. 1997 are expected to drop 2 percent during Jan-Sept. 1998 from the same months a year earlier.
SOYBEAN OIL PRICES In
February, U.S. prices were up 6 percent from the previous month
to a level 18 percent above a year ago, reflecting a 18 percent
reduction in U.S. soybean oil stocks from a year earlier. Soybean
oil prices in February were 21 percent above the depressed July
1997 level, but only slightly above its long-term trend. Previous
cyclical peaks in soybean oil prices were $675 per metric ton in
December 1994 and $654 per metric ton in July 1988. The downtrend
in nominal prices for U.S. soybean oil, as well as other major
vegetable oils which persisted for decades reversed during the
last decade. The price reversal reflected the slowing rate of
expansion in global meal use in the developed countries, as well
as accelerating incomes and oil usage in the developing
countries. The long-term upward trend in vegetable prices will
likely continue for the foreseeable future.
U.S. SOYBEAN OIL USAGE & EXPORTS
With a record crush of 1.48 billion bushels, up 6.6 percent
during the 12 months ending Dec. 1997, U.S. soybean oil domestic
disappearance, during the same 12 months at 14.44 billion pounds
gained 5.6 percent, while Jan. 1, 1998 U.S. soybean oil stocks
dropped 18 percent from a year earlier. The above average
increase in domestic disappearance was inconsistent with factory
consumption as reported by Census. This could indicate some
buildup in oil in unreported positions. The current forecast
would imply only a 0.4 percent increase in domestic disappearance
during Jan-Sept. 1998, much less than the long-term average
increase of 3.1 percent. U.S. soybean oil exports during Oct-Dec.
1997 rose to 841 million pounds, or 32 percent above a year
earlier. Larger U.S. movements to China through Hong Kong
accounted for most of the increase. The oil export recovery took
place during a period of rising prices. Historically, forward
coverage tends to surge during period of rising prices. The
current export forecast implies that U.S. soybean oil exports
will increase 26 percent during Jan-Sept. 1998 from the same
month last year.
OIL % OF SOYBEAN PRODUCT VALUE
In February, the U.S. soybean oil share of product value was 39.4
percent, or 41 percent more than a year earlier and the highest
level since September 1995. Since October 1985, U.S. soybean oil
as a share of total soybean product value ranged between 26.11
and 47.58 percent and averaged 33.54 percent. Following a down
trend during the 1960's and 1970's, the soybean oil/48% meal
price ratio trended upward during the last decade.
PALM OIL OUTPUT SLOWS AS CHINA'S IMPORTS
GROW On February 1, Malaysian palm oil stocks
were down 11 percent from a year earlier, despite output
expansion. The reduction in Malaysian oil stocks reflected
slowing output expansion, as well as growing exports to China.
During the 12 months ending January 1998, Malaysian palm oil
output expansion slowed to 7 percent, compared with 9 percent
during the 12 months ending September 1997. However, the current
Malaysian palm oil output forecast of 8.8 million tons for
Oct-Sept 1997/98 implies reduced output in coming months. The
lagged effects of reduced rainfall indicate less favorable yields
in Malaysia and also Sumatra region of Indonesia in coming
months. Reduced output would result in reduced stocks and higher
prices, but China holds the key. China, the world's leading
importer is expected to expand vegetable oil imports by 0.52
million tons, including 0.13 million tons more palm oil,
reflecting reduced indigenous output, chiefly peanut oil.
However, China's oil stock data are incomplete so it is difficult
to predict exactly how much China will need or when they will
cover those requirements.
PALM OIL PRICES February
1998 Malaysian FOB prices for refined bleached deodorized (RBD)
palm oil were up 8 percent from the previous month and 18 percent
above a year earlier. Malaysian FOB prices for palm oil rose to a
4 percent premium over Decatur soybean oil, compared with a 1
percent average premium during the last 12 months and a 17
percent average discount during the decade ending Sept. 1997.
COCONUT OIL The February
1998 U.S. coconut oil price was 28 percent below a year earlier,
but 5 percent above its 10-year average for that month. The price
cut reflected larger exports resulting from a sizable expansion
in lauric acid oil output in the Philippines, Indonesia and
Malaysia. With a relatively inelastic demand for lauric acid oils
and limited inter-substitutability with other oils, prices for
these oils in coming months could very be sensitive to output
changes. The lagged effects of less favorable rainfall may curb
the expansion in lauric acid oil output and exports from these
three countries in 1997/98. Therefore the combined 1997/98 lauric
oil output from the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia is
forecast to drop 3 percent following last year's 17 percent
increase. With inelastic demand, U.S. lauric acid oil usage is
forecast at 0.64 million tons or 4 percent above its 5-year
average, while net imports of lauric acid are forecast at 0.63
million tons, or 2 percent over its 5-year average. U.S. imports
of lauric acid oils tend to fall short of usage when prices favor
stock depletion.
US EXPORTS TO SELECTED COUNTRIES: With an 8.3 million ton increase in 1997/98 U.S. oilseed supplies, U.S. oilseed and product exports during Oct-Dec 1997 increased 2.9 million tons. Although the volume of U.S. oilseed product exports increased 22 percent in Oct-Dec 1996, export unit values dipped only 2 percent, reflecting tight supplies abroad. U.S. soybean exports through December were up 20 percent with Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, the Netherlands, Spain, Taiwan and Indonesia accounting for most of the gain. Comparably, U.S. soybean meal exports through Dec. 1997 were up 38 percent with Spain, France, Italy, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, and Germany showing significant gains. U.S. oil exports for the same three months were up 32 percent with the bulk of the increase moving to China through Hong Kong, with minor gains to Korea, Mexico, Peru, Tunisia, and the Dom. Republic. In coming months, U.S. exports of most oilseeds and meals will slow sharply, reflecting heavier competition from South America, U.S. vegetable oil exports should continue to expand at double digit rates, reflecting below-normal expansion in foreign vegetable oil supplies.
Alan Holz PH (202) 720-0143; FAX (202) 720-7670
|