Programs and Opportunities
Iowa, Host
to the World: International Biotechnology Information
Conference
 |
|
Photo
courtesy of Mary Ponomarenko, FAS Grain and Feed
Division |
December
2005
Printable version
By Mary Ponomarenko
See also . .
.
"FAS Sows
Seeds of Agricultural Progress: The Borlaug
Fellows Program"
What do the
President of the Korean Federation of Housewives Clubs,
the CEO (chief executive officer) of the Kenyan Cereal
Producers, Argentinean technical advisors to Codex
Alimentarius and Ministry of Agriculture officials from
Botswana, Bulgaria, Brazil and Thailand have in common?
They were among more than 100 plant and animal research
scientists, policy makers, and consumer and farm
organization leaders, representing over 50 countries,
who came to Iowa in October 2005 to learn more about
biotechnology and to participate in the World Food Prize
ceremony.
|
The
World Food Prize, known as "the Nobel Prize for food
and agriculture," is the foremost award recognizing
breakthrough achievements improving the quality,
quantity or availability of food. |
The fourth
International Biotechnology Information Conference,
sponsored by the U.S. Grains Council using development
funds from FAS (the Foreign Agricultural Service), the
Iowa Corn Promotion Board, the Nebraska Corn Board, the
National Corn Growers Association and the Partnership to
Cut Hunger and Poverty in Africa, drew a record number
of participants—a testament to the growing reputation of
the conference and the increasing importance of the
subject.
"Our goal
is to foster greater international understanding of
biotechnology by giving the decision makers a first-hand
look at the entire corn production chain," said Gordon
Wassenaar, past chair of the Iowa Corn Promotion Board
and host to the group. "Delegates are taken from the
laboratory to my farm and from a terminal elevator to
the grocery store. It really gives them a chance to see
U.S. agriculture at its best and experience our way of
life both on the farm and as consumers."

Participants had a chance to talk with scientists
one-on-one while touring Iowa State University
during the International Biotechnology Information
Conference.
Photo
courtesy of U.S. Grains Council |

Photo courtesy of Mary Ponomarenko, FAS Grain and
Feed Division |
Consideration and Conversation Were the Order of the Day
Participants visited farms, grain storage and
transportation facilities, and public and private
laboratories. The program included U.S. and
international producer panels and a biosafety regulation
discussion panel. The World Food Prize ceremony was a
highlight of the conference.
Although
U.S. organizations sponsored the event, a European
served as the conference moderator. A key lesson learned
was that although the United States and the EU (European
Union) have many common views and experiences regarding
science, our views on policy differ. The conference
emphasized the need for three vital elements—good
science, good policy and good communication.
What Is
Biotechnology?
Bio means
"life" and technology means "tools." Biotechnology is
the scientific manipulation of living organisms,
especially at the molecular genetic level, to produce
useful products. It is not a radical departure from past
breeding and selection practices, although it does
enable scientists to work at the molecular level of
selection. And did you know the word first appeared in
print in 1919?
Biotechnology is only a tool. Therefore, sound
production practices and regulation are key to assessing
and managing potential risk and addressing biosafety
questions, as with any new product introduction.
What Did We
Learn About Risk Assessment and Risk Management?
Risk is a
function of hazard, whether you are assessing risk to
people, animals or the environment. In biology, as in
many aspects of our daily lives, zero risk is not
possible. It is important to balance the potential
benefits of a new technology with the possible risks.
One
potential risk posed by biotech products is the
introduction of proteins that are allergenic to humans
or animals. Laboratory techniques used to assess the
safety of biotech products are sophisticated to the
point of identifying a single gene, marking it, and then
tracing and testing the protein it produces. Extensive
testing and analysis eliminates use of any gene that
produces a protein with characteristics common to
allergens.

The
conference also allowed time for field visits.
Here, a grower and member of the Iowa Corn
Promotion Board explains why he uses genetically
modified seeds in crop rotation to a participant.
Photo courtesy of U.S. Grains Council |

Photo courtesy of Mary Ponomarenko, FAS Grain and
Feed Division |
In fact,
with an increased understanding of allergens,
researchers are hopeful biotechnology will aid in the
removal of the allergens commonly found in traditionally
produced foods, including soybeans and rice.
Over 90
feeding studies on cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, fish and
rabbits have demonstrated that animal tissues retain no
biotech components from consuming genetically modified
feed, eliminating concerns about potential residual
effects on humans from consumption of products from
these animals.
Studies
show that biotech crops can have positive effects on the
environment. Biotech crops such as Bt corn or cotton
specifically target a particular insect pest, while
traditional farming practices often require the use of
broad-spectrum pesticides that kill many more species of
insects, including beneficial ones.
Biotech
crops require significantly lower pesticide and
herbicide use and can be cultivated with low- and
no-till practices. Less chemical runoff leaves water
cleaner and soils healthier.
Yet despite
the tremendous acceptance of biotech crops in developed
countries with large commercial production—i.e., the
United States, Argentina and Canada—biotechnology may
actually have more benefit and applicability for small
subsistence farms in the poorest countries of the world.
More than 8 million producers worldwide use
biotechnology, about 90 percent of them small farmers in
developing countries.
AfricaBio,
a nonprofit organization, administered Bt corn
demonstration plots in South Africa. They found yield
increases of 25-65 percent. The overwhelming success of
Bt cotton with small producers in India forced a policy
change for acceptance in that country.
|
Sound production practices and regulation are key
to assessing and managing risk and biosafety
concerns. |
In
addition, the poorer, smaller producer has less access
to the chemical inputs, and the safety equipment and
procedures required to use them, which are
necessary to grow traditional crops. Transgenic
crop production is a sound technology for small
producers, but requires different management practices.
This is a growing research priority.
Sound
Science Does Not Speak for Itself
Sound
public policy must be built on sound science; sound
science and sound policy can only be brought about by
sound communication. History has shown that scientific
facts do not effectively speak for themselves.
Andy
Benson, vice president of international relations for
the International Food Information Council, discussed
surveys that sharply outline some public opinion
differences in the United States and the EU. Over 75
percent of U.S. consumers surveyed feel their food is
safe, and more than 60 percent believe biotechnology
benefits them. U.S. consumers generally trust government
regulators and the scientific community.
In the EU,
less than 3 percent of people polled trust government
officials, less than 6 percent trust scientists, and
less than 9 percent trust the medical profession.
Conversely, more than 50 percent trust information from
consumer groups. These perceptions are tied to public
health policy failures in recent years.
Scientific
facts are filtered through policy and public opinion.
This underscores the importance of making science
understandable to policy makers, public opinion shapers
and the general public.
|
Dr.
Borlaug’s Wish List |
|
A Nobel
Peace Prize recipient in 1970, father of the Green
Revolution for his groundbreaking work in rice and wheat
genetics and co-founder of the World Food Prize, Dr.
Norman E. Borlaug has promoted new technologies to
increase food production for the poorest of the poor.

Dr.
Norman Borlaug, Nobel Peace Prize winner and
World Food Prize creator, discusses the
importance of biotechnology with Larry Jons,
U.S. Grains Council Membership and
Communications Advisory Team member and Iowa
Corn Promotion Board delegate.
Photo courtesy of U.S. Grains Council
|
Now over
ninety, Dr. Borlaug still brings a passion to his work
and shares his vision with all who will listen. At the
conference, he said that despite all of our collective
accomplishments, the world food supply will have to
double by 2050 to keep up with population growth. Most
of the production will have to take place in the
countries where it is consumed, primarily on land
already in production.
His
personal wish list includes witnessing the transfer of
rice’s natural immunity against rust to other cereal
crops and seeing the transfer of bread wheat’s proteins
to rice and corn.
Dr. Borlaug
challenged the audience to fight against the fear of new
technology and move forward on these pressing issues.
The World
Food Prize and the Blue Revolution
The World
Food Prize, known as "the Nobel Prize for food and
agriculture," is the foremost award for breakthrough
achievements improving the quality, quantity or
availability of food. It recognizes accomplishments in
any field that contribute to the world food supply,
including food and agricultural science and technology,
manufacturing, marketing, nutrition, economics, poverty
alleviation, political leadership and the social
sciences.
Dr. Robert
Havener and Dr. Borlaug founded the prize in 1986 to
emphasize the importance of a nutritious, sustainable
food supply for all people. By honoring those who have
worked successfully toward this goal, the prize calls
attention to what has been done to improve the world
food supply, and what can be accomplished in the future.
In keeping
with the tradition of Dr. Borlaug and the Green
Revolution, this year Dr. Modadugu V. Gupta was chosen
as the sixth World Food Prize laureate. Dr. Gupta has
led the "Blue Revolution" in freshwater aquaculture with
a lifetime of exceptional achievement in developing and
spreading simple technologies for aquaculture. He has
enriched the diets and the lives of more than a million
of world’s poorest people by enhancing the growth and
yield of fish species through genetic modification.
Through his
leadership in the international Network on Genetics in
Aquaculture, Dr. Gupta has helped spread biodiversity
across Asia and Africa. He participated in developing
biosafety frameworks and trained nearly 300 scientists
from developing countries, ensuring that international
cooperation and research in freshwater aquaculture can
continue to expand and improve.
|
Biotechnology Now and in the Future
New
varieties of crops may offer many benefits—higher
yields, applicability in developing as well as developed
countries, lower use of toxic chemical inputs and a
proven safety record with humans, animals and the
environment.
Experts at
the conference agreed that biotechnology is a valuable
tool for addressing the problems of hunger, malnutrition
and even obesity. New research continues to improve the
nutritional content of subsistence crops, like cassava.
Researchers are also attempting to eliminate transfats
from soy oil and to generate better soy proteins.
Biotechnology is entering a phase of plant-derived
biologics. Research is ongoing to develop that plants
which can produce therapeutic proteins for
pharmaceutical use. Tobacco, potatoes, tomatoes and
bananas are being used to research the production of
vaccines against diseases such as cholera and hepatitis
B. These breakthroughs could have the significant
benefit of reducing the costs of pharmaceuticals in
developing countries.
Improving
the efficiency of irrigated agriculture is also
critical. Irrigation accounts for 70 percent of current
global water use; irrigated crops account for 40 percent
of the world’s food harvest. Researchers are therefore
striving to increase drought tolerance in many crops.
There are
no simple answers to the complex questions posed by
biotechnology. However, insightful dialogue can provide
a more meaningful context for understanding the pro’s
and con’s and lead to further appropriate questioning
and better public policy decisions. This was the essence
of the International Biotechnology Information
Conference.
Mary
Ponomarenko is an agricultural marketing specialist in
the FAS Grain and Feed Division. E-mail:
Mary.Ponomarenko@usda.gov
|