Market and Trade Data
Indonesia’s Textile
Industry Provides Material Market
for U.S. Cotton
September 2005
Printable version
By Christopher Rittgers
and Rosida Nababan
See also.
. .
FAS Report
ID5009
Like
most business sectors in Indonesia, which continue to
struggle in an uncertain business climate, many textile
companies faced ups and downs in 2004. But despite the
problems, general prospects for the textile sector are
encouraging. In calendar 2004, exports of Indonesian
textiles and related products reached about $7.3
billion, up 5 percent from the previous year, and
textile exports remain the largest non-oil, export-based
contributor to national income.
|
In
marketing year 2004, Indonesia was the
fourth-largest foreign market for U.S. cotton,
with sales of 1.13 million bales, up about 35
percent from the previous year. |
Off With
the Old, On With the New
While there were many positive developments in the
sector, in general calendar 2004 proved difficult,
particularly for Indonesia’s least productive textile
operators. Some mills shut down, and others had to cut
back significantly on production. Indonesian textile
mills are now running at about 80 percent of capacity.
Most
textile companies face similar constraints: difficulty
in obtaining credit and trade financing from banks,
increasing operational costs (for oil, electricity,
terminal handling and so on) and dependency on imported
raw materials (such as cotton, yarn, fabric and
machinery).
Indonesia continues to face stiff competition from other
textile exporters, especially China, and imports of
low-priced finished textile products into the country
have hurt the domestic industry. Furthermore, generally
unstable economic conditions have hampered Indonesian
consumers’ purchasing power and have limited domestic
demand growth.
Adaptation
Nonetheless, most Indonesian mills have succeeded in
finding ways to survive and compete, especially
export-oriented companies. Some mills have changed
strategy from operating in all sectors (such as
integrated spinning, weaving and garment fabrication),
to focusing on one or two areas in which they excel.
Some are concentrating on high-end markets and looking
for new markets abroad, instead of attempting to compete
on a price basis with China, India and Pakistan.
Most
Indonesian textile companies realize that they need to
upgrade their equipment and facilities to produce
high-quality products efficiently. Expansion is slow,
however, partly because of limited domestic financing.
The Indonesian banking sector has still not fully
recovered from the regional financial crisis in the late
1990s, and many of Indonesia’s larger textile companies
continue to be heavily debt ridden.
Raw,
Intermediate Goods Interwoven With Industry
The Indonesian textile industry imports almost all of
its cotton needs. In marketing year 2003 (August
2003-July 2004), Indonesian cotton consumption fell
about 5 percent from the previous year to 2.15
million 480-lb. bales.
But
export markets grew slightly in marketing year 2004, and
total cotton consumption is estimated to have risen
about 4 percent to 2.25 million bales. Consumption for
marketing year 2005 is projected at 2.3 million bales.
Imports could trend upward if high world oil prices
affect prices for polyester and other synthetic yarns.
Indonesian yarn and fabric production grew by 3 percent
in calendar 2004. The domestic yarn market remains
depressed, in part because of competition from low-cost
yarn from Pakistan. Sixty percent of Indonesia’s yarn
production goes to domestic producers of fabric and
garments, most of which are subsequently exported.
Indonesian garment production rose about 11 percent in
calendar 2004. Indonesian spinners currently keep around
two months’ worth of cotton in stock.
U.S.
Cotton Integral Part of the Fabric
The outlook for U.S. cotton in this market is positive,
buoyed by competitive U.S. prices and increased
Indonesian demand for cotton in export products such as
denim. U.S. cotton supplied about 50 percent of
Indonesia’s total domestic consumption in marketing year
2004; Brazil, India and African countries also increased
their exports.
In
marketing year 2004, Indonesia was the fourth-largest
foreign market for U.S. cotton, with sales of 1.13
million bales, up about 35 percent from the previous
year. The Export Credit Guarantee Program (GSM-102),
once an important means of facilitating U.S. cotton
sales to Indonesia, has played a declining role lately
and was used to underwrite only 10 percent of sales in
fiscal 2004. Restructuring of USDA’s export credit
programs may further limit GSM-102 use in this market.
Traders
note that the comparatively long shipping times
(averaging one month) for U.S. cotton to reach Indonesia
hinders trade. In contrast, Australia, China and other
exporters offer more flexible contracts and more
frequent shipping. The future position of U.S. cotton in
this market will hinge on its price relative to supplies
from other countries.
Indonesia’s imports of cotton yarn dropped about 30
percent in calendar 2004, but imports of cotton fabrics
rose 7 percent. Pakistan and China remained the major
yarn suppliers (with market shares of about 30 and 20
percent, respectively). China and Hong Kong were the
major suppliers of cotton fabric. The United States
ships almost no cotton yarn or fabric to Indonesia.
Indonesia’s cotton yarn exports declined about 15
percent in calendar 2004. But yarn production is
growing, and exports are expected to recover in 2005.
Cotton fabric exports held steady.
The
major foreign markets for Indonesia’s cotton yarn are
Japan, Hong Kong, China and South Korea, with only about
4 percent destined for the United States. Italy,
Bangladesh, Japan and Hong Kong are the major markets
for Indonesian cotton fabric, while the United States is
the top destination for garments.
Policy
Changes and Challenges Intertwined
In accordance with the Uruguay Round Agreement on
Textiles and Clothing, all quotas on textiles and
apparel were removed for all members of the WTO (World
Trade Organization) on Jan.1, 2005. Indonesia attempted
to delay removal of the international textile quotas
because the government was concerned about declining
market share for Indonesian textile products in the
United States and competition from China. However, many
Indonesian companies think the new non-quota system
creates opportunities for expansion and encourages
greater efficiency, quality and productivity. The end of
the quotas will likely bring more Indonesian yarn and
fabric into the U.S. market.
The
United States, the EU and other countries have imposed
safeguard quotas on Chinese textiles and garments under
China’s WTO accession agreement. These quotas will
likely limit damage to the Indonesian textile industry
and help buoy its share of the U.S. market. To compete
with China in the domestic market, the Indonesian
textile association has asked that the import tariff for
garments be increased to 25 percent.
Indonesia’s value-added tax discourages its mills from
expanding export-oriented production. Moreover,
procedural requirements often delay the process of
getting refunds based on exports.
Smuggling of imported textile products and secondhand
garments continues to be a serious issue. Demand for
these lower-priced products is high in Indonesia, giving
traders strong incentives to import them. New
documentation requirements have been largely ineffective
in halting import smuggling.
Christopher
Rittgers is
the
attaché and
Rosida
Nababan is
an
agricultural specialist in the FAS Office of
Agricultural Affairs in Jakarta, Indonesia. E-mail:
fasjkt@cbn.net.id |