FAS Online logo Return to the FAS Home page

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Catholic Relief Services

Summary of Findings

Final: During the 2001-2002 school year, Catholic Relief Services (CRS) in Bosnia and Herzegovina implemented the USDA Global Food for Education (GFE) Program in 106 schools in 37 cities, targeting over 34,000 of the most vulnerable students in those 106 schools. CRS began the 2002-2003 school year by increasing the number of beneficiaries to approximately 40,000 in 120 schools, and further increased the number of beneficiaries to 53,800.

Like other countries in the Eastern European region, Bosnia and Herzegovina places a high societal and cultural emphasis on the importance of education. In fact, in Bosnia and Herzegovina families have a legal obligation to enroll their school-aged children in appropriate educational institutions. Therefore school enrollment statistics do not show an increase. However, CRS reports did show an average attendance increase of 22% (21% for girls and 23% for boys).

By funding local contact groups, CRS has worked to encourage a greater sense of community involvement in the school. CRS awarded 224 grants, of 12,000 USD each, to Parent School Councils (PSC’s) over the course of the program.

CRS has coordinated with a network of over 20 bakeries in the various localities in which the program is operated. The bakeries prepare the meals for the schools and then deliver them on a daily basis. In return, CRS supplies the bakeries with some of the hard red winter wheat that they receive from the commodity shipment. Through these agreements, the bakeries have expanded their businesses, resulting in the creation of dozens of new jobs. The bakeries have become more educated about nutritional requirements for feeding children, they have purchased new equipment, developed a logistical plans in for delivering to multiple locations at the same time and have developed a good relationship with the schools. All of these developments have made the bakeries more competitive parties in the market, and as such the jobs newly created as a result of GFE are seen as sustainable.

Midterm: Five million meals have been served to 34,000 students in 106 schools from October 2001 through June 2002. Preliminary information from Catholic Relief Services (CRS) indicates an increase in attendance of approximately 10%, and an increase of about 45% in the number of students who attend at least a portion of the school day. The parent-school councils launched successful activities to improve school facilities through the small grants program. Economic benefits were spawned by 16 Global Food for Education Program (GFE) contracts with local bakeries that provided the meals. These contracts allowed the bakeries to hire additional employees and in some cases expand the range of products they provided to local communities. With the project extension, the feeding program and other activities will continue from September 2002 through June 2003.

Country Overview

Bosnia and Herzegovina is a mountainous country in southeast Europe with approximately three million inhabitants. Formerly part of the Socialist Republic of Yugoslavia, the country experienced four brutal years of war between 1992-95 that caused severe destruction of the infrastructure, economy, and human lives. Although the war ended in November 1995 with the signing of the Dayton Peace Accord, the country is still crippled economically, politically, and socially. Huge numbers of people displaced by the war are returning to their devastated communities without necessary resources and with a general lack of social services. Unemployment was approximately 40% in 1999.1

Within this context, education is one of the areas of most promise in terms of solving problems, but it is also the area where the political and social struggles are most evident. Schools must not only cope with war-related tensions and economic stagnation, but they struggle to survive within an education system based both on a centralized social past and a decentralized post-war bureaucracy that can no longer adequately meet their needs. There is currently no effective Ministry of Education at the country level, while parallel ethnic structures in some regions (e.g., Bosniak and Croat) are making the situation even more complicated. The net result is that quality education and the future human capital of the country is compromised.

The following is a sketch of the current education system. The country is divided into two entities: the Federation, where the majority of the population is Muslim and Croat; and the Republika Srpska (RS), whose population consists mostly of Serbs. The region called Herzegovina is contiguous to Croatia and traditionally has been settled by an ethnic Croat majority. The Federation and the RS have separate Ministries of Education that rarely communicate. The RS maintains a highly centralized system inherited from Yugoslavia. The Federation is broken into 10 cantons, and most of the decision-making pertaining to educational issues resides at this level. Two cantons of the Federation have parallel structures, Bosniak and Croat, that implement two separate ethnically based school policies and curricula.

Eight years of primary education are mandatory. Parents are held legally accountable for sending their children to school. Children are usually enrolled in the primary school closest to their homes. In rural areas, a walk of six miles over mountainous terrain may sometimes be necessary. Secondary education is optional, but almost 90% of teenagers complete this level. The secondary school course of study lasts three to four years, depending on the area of specialization. The teachers rarely receive their salaries, and in general are not satisfied with their working conditions because they lack books and equipment.2 Given the socialist past of Bosnia-Herzegovina, there is no historic active involvement of the wider community in school activities and, ironically, the legacy of the recent war destroyed many schools and community relationships at the moment when their involvement is critical to developing the country.

Within this environment, CRS developed a proposal and signed a GFE agreement with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The CRS program is designed to mitigate economic reasons for low attendance and relieve hunger-based hindrances to classroom learning, as well as to promote parent/community involvement in education. CRS began in October 2001 after identifying 106 schools out of 222 for which a thorough assessment was conducted.

Commodity Management

Final: USDA commodity shipments arrive in the port of Ploce, on the coast of the Adriatic Sea. It is estimated that 20% of the port’s annual business comes from the arrival of the commodities, and it is believed that the USDA commodity shipments contribute to the maintenance of several hundred jobs.

CRS received 24,630 metric tons of hard red winter wheat for school year 2001-2002. On October 29, 2001, the commodities arrived at the port of Ploce, on the Adriatic Sea. CRS delivered these commodities to their final destinations beginning on October 30, 2001 and completed on November 29, 2001. 22,000 tons were monetized, and the remaining 2,630 tons were distributed to the partner bakeries as payment for their preparation and delivery of meals.

For the 2002-2003 school year, CRS received 24,400 metric tons of the hard red winter wheat. The ship arrived at Ploce on December 12, 2002. The delivery of the commodities commenced on December 17, 2002, and was completed on January 15, 2003. CRS monetized 21,400 tons, while the remaining 3,000 tons were distributed as payment to the partner bakeries.

Midterm: CRS received 24,630 metric tons of hard red winter wheat. A total of 22,000 tons was monetized, and the remainder was provided to local bakeries to prepare bread for school sandwiches and nutritional pastries. The proceeds from monetization were used to purchase ingredients, such as meat and cheese, from local sources for the sandwiches and pastries. The caloric value of each meal is 450 calories. Additionally, each meal provides 12 grams of protein, 70 grams of carbohydrates, and 15 grams of fat (27% of caloric intake).

Project Overview

Goals and objectives

Final: The primary goals remained the same in essence, particularly with regards to the program’s impact on attendance. CRS did add and meet a new objective, that of expanding the scope of the program so that the number of children receiving GFE benefits approaches 55,000 by May of 2003, and the number of schools increases comparably.

Midterm: The primary goals are to increase rates of attendance and rates of enrollment, but there are a number of additional objectives.

Strengthen community infrastructure for addressing school improvements through the formation of parent-school councils.

Facilitate school repairs, improvements in the learning environment, and upgrades of teaching equipment and materials.

Increase the number of lunches served to vulnerable school children, particularly children of returned refugee families. Provide meals to a minimum of 30,000 students in at least 100 primary schools.

Provide highly nutritional lunches in school for returned refugee students and other vulnerable students.

Develop and strengthen school lunch parent-teacher contact groups, which monitor distribution of school lunches.

Provide small school lunch grants to participant schools to improve the ability of parent-teacher contact groups to provide meals and improve the general learning environment.

Provide school improvement grants to parent-school councils to improve the learning environment in accordance with needs identified by parent-school councils.

Develop parent-school councils in schools, targeting schools with a high population of returned refugees.

Strengthen parent-school councils by providing training in topics such as the role of the family in raising children, conflict resolution, conducting needs assessments and prioritization of needs, designing project proposals, and fund raising.

Implementation status

Final: Meal service began in October 2001 and has continued through the 2001-2002 school year, providing more than 5 million meals during that time. Meal service began again in October of 2002 for the 2002-2003 school year, and continues to date. Program targeting remained essentially unchanged in the 2002-2003 school year. CRS used the same criteria but expanded the numbers of beneficiaries to approximately 53,800.

The development of the contact groups and parent-school councils has continued throughout the country, and it is the intention of CRS to ultimately transfer the responsibility of administering school feeding to these organizations when they are ready to assume this responsibility. To that end, CRS continues to hold training and development seminars with the groups in order that they become able to contribute to the longer term, broader interests of the school and its population. School Contact Groups (CGs) consist of a minimum of two parents and two teachers. Their prime role is food management, but they also implement the small school projects (2,000 USD worth) after they receive training in needs prioritization and proposal writing. The CG’s also serve as the grassroots basis for potential PSC’s, which consist of a minimum of six parents and six teachers. At the end of the year, the most successful schools and their CGs are "promoted" to PSC and it turn become eligible to apply for bigger grants (12,000 USD).

The awarding of small grants for the improvement of school facilities continued through the same competitive proposal process. A total of 110 grants were awarded for the 2002-2003 school year. In the first year of operation, CRS awarded 166 CG grants of 2,000 USD for infrastructure repair and other projects. In the second year, an additional 110 sites were approved for a grant. Also in the first year, CRS awarded 112 PSC grants of 12,000 USD. The same number was awarded in the second year.

Both the CG and the PSC grants are designated for the improvement of school facilities, the purchase of technical equipment, computers, or other physical amenities. Projects have included library improvement, purchase of teaching equipment, improvement of school and recreation facilities and landscaping to improve the educational environment. Parents and teachers regularly made in-kind contributions of labor and materials, at a minimum of 25% of each small project value. Ultimately, CRS intends to transfer the responsibility for school feeding from the centralized level to the level of the local PSC’s.

Midterm: Meal service began in October 2001 and has continued through the school year ending June 2002. An average of more than 34,000 students were provided meals in 106 schools. More than 5 million meals were provided during the 2001-2002 school year.

Small grants for the improvement of school facilities were provided to both parent-school councils ($12,000 limit) and the contact groups ($2,000) through a competitive proposal process. Projects included library improvement, purchase of teaching equipment, improvement of school and recreation facilities, and landscaping to improve the educational environment. Parents and teachers regularly made in-kind contributions of labor and materials amounting to a minimum of 25% of the value of each small project.

In order to provide students with a high quality, nutritious lunch, CRS contacted the Office of School Nutrition at the Institute for Public Health for information on types of student lunches. Based on the findings and CRS resources, 15 different menus were created to meet both nutritional requirements and the expectations of students. CRS provided these suggested menus to potential bakeries during the tender organized for school lunch production. The ability of a bakery to cost-efficiently produce the range of menu items was one of the criteria used in the selection of the contractors. After more than six months of distribution experience, CRS reduced the menus from 15 to between five and 10, allowing the bakeries and the schools to choose the appropriate menus for the students in the program. Regardless of the area or producer, the most frequent meals produced each week included sandwiches with cheese or salami, or chocolate or doughnuts.

The program targets more than 34,122 of the most vulnerable students using the following criteria:

Students without one or both parents.

Students with both parents unemployed.

Students with special needs.

Student returnees from refugee families.

Students who travel more than four kilometers from home to school.

To facilitate proper implementation and foster community ownership, this project has also supported the establishment of a grassroots mechanism to ensure distribution oversight, provide regular updates of beneficiary lists, and ensure targeting of the most needy. Two mechanisms were used at the community level: contact groups and parent-school councils. Contact groups consisting of parents and teachers were formed in each of the participating 106 schools. Each group has a minimum of two teachers and two parents who, in addition to the previously mentioned activities, also work on identifying and addressing school needs with limited funds. In addition, 16 parent-school councils were formed from the more developed groups of parents and teachers who, after assessment, were determined to have the skills to contribute to the longer term, broader interests of the school. Training in small project design and management was provided for the 16 new parent-school councils.

Other donor support: Teachers, school officials, and parents contribute labor and logistical support at the school sites.

Sustainability

Final: CRS intends to ultimately turn the administration of school feeding in Bosnia and Herzegovina over to the local parent-school councils.

Midterm: Parent-school councils and contact groups facilitated by CRS represent sustainable infrastructure enhancements that will be positioned to help resolve local school needs in the future.

Monitoring and evaluation

Final: See evaluation methodology in Appendix 1.

Midterm: The following table summarizes the results of the GFE program in Bosnia-Herzegovina as of June 30, 2002.

No. Indicator Target (as described in original proposal) Achievement

April 2002

Achievement

July 2002

1 Increased number of girls and boys attending school 5 to 10% increase above initial level before school lunch program began Average of 45% for girls and 43% for boys for sample of 7 schools (6.6% of total);

A baseline established at the end of the first semester

Average percentage change of 22% increase (21% for girls and 23% for boys)
2 Increased number of lunches served to vulnerable school children particularly children of returnee refugee families 30,000 students in 100 primary schools Average of 33,730 vulnerable students in 106 primary schools served during nine distribution months of the program
3 Provide highly nutritional lunches in school for returned refugee and other vulnerable students

Of recommended daily requirements, lunches will provide: 20% of protein; 65% of carbohydrates; 27% of fat to 30,000 vulnerable students  

Average nutritional value provided in distributed sandwich:

·1 Protein: 15g (25% of daily protein requirement for children age 7-14)

·2 Carbohydrates: 85g (23% of daily requirement)

·3 Fat: 15g (24% of daily requirement)

4 Develop and strengthen school lunch parent-teacher contact groups, which distribute school lunches 100 parent-teacher contact groups above the baseline (contact groups will include in total at least 200 teachers and 200 parents)

·1 106 parent-teacher contact group created; 215 parents, 257 school workers or teachers involved;

·2 Four training sessions conducted for all contact groups;

·3 Training topics were: needs identification and prioritization, project proposal design, developing tender packages, and organoleptic food control. Through trainings contact group members received basic knowledge and skills for identifying and addressing school needs.

·4 106 parent-teacher contact group created; 201 parents, 266 school workers or teachers involved;

·5 Trainings completed in first reporting period.

5 Provide small school lunch grants to participant schools to improve the ability of Parent-Teacher Contact Groups to provide meals Approximately 50 school lunch grants 132 small grants approved 133 small grants approved in second reporting period. Total of 265 grants implemented over duration of the program
6 Develop parent-school councils (PSC) in schools, targeting schools with a high population of returned refugees 16 parent-school councils above the baseline 16 parent-school councils created
7 Strengthen PSCs by providing training in topics such as: role of the family in raising children, conflict resolution, conducting needs assessments and prioritization of needs, designing project proposals, and fund raising 16 parent-school councils trained above baseline 91% of training sessions conducted 100% of training sessions conducted (total of 80 sessions)
8 Provide school improvements grants to PSCs to improve the learning environment in accordance with PSC identified needs At least 16 school improvement grants above baseline 30 school improvement grants approved, additional 40 in preparatory phase (of funding for 30 approved projects approximately 45% spent on infrastructure projects) Total of 112 school improvement grants implemented over the course of the project (approximately 40% of resources spent on infrastructure projects)

Additional Indicators to Measure Program Progress, Impact

No. Indicator Target Achievement

April 2002

Achievement

September 2002

9 Increased number of students attending extra-curricular activities 5 to 10% increase above initial level before school lunch program began Average increase of 7% for girls and 9% for boys on sample of seven schools;

Baseline established

Overall increase of 3%, 2% for girls, 3% for boys
10 Contact Groups mature enough to become PSCs 20 Contact Groups The Contact Groups are monitored on monthly basis on their progress Based on performance over the course of the project, geographical and building critical mass criteria, general impression of staff working in specific schools, 20 the most mature Contact Groups were selected to become PSC in the coming year
11 Individual beneficiary satisfaction on school lunch received Sample of 400 students/beneficiaries interviewed on monthly basis and 80% of them demonstrates satisfaction with lunch received 100% of 1,723 interviewed over four and half months of program implementation expressed satisfaction with lunch received* 99.95% of 1,178 interviewed over last distribution period of program expressed satisfaction with lunch received*

Midterm: Both USDA and CRS are monitoring and evaluating this project. CRS has developed a number of monitoring and evaluation tools to collect data, including attendance forms, contact group quality forms, monitors’ reports (field staff report monthly), distribution control forms, individual beneficiary reports, and waybill forms to track the transport and delivery of flour to bakeries.

USDA identified a local monitor working through a non-governmental organization who is collecting baseline data on 20 schools using a standard USDA GFE questionnaire. Additionally, stakeholders at the 20 sample schools plus an additional 30 schools are being visited to collect information on implementation and impact based on feedback from teachers, parents, students, and community members.

The following table summarizes the results of the GFE program in Bosnia-Herzegovina as of March 31, 2002.

No. Indicator Target (as described in original proposal) Achievement

1

Increased number of girls and boys attending school. 5% to 10% increase above the level before the school lunch program began. Average increase of 45% for girls and 43% for boys for sample of seven schools (6.6% of total).

2

Increased number of lunches served to vulnerable school children, particularly children of returned refugee families. 30,000 students in 100 primary schools. As of October 2001, meal service for 34,122 students in 106 primary schools. Detailed breakdown of beneficiaries per category per month.

3

Highly nutritious lunches in school for returned refugee and other vulnerable students.

Of recommended daily requirements, lunches that provide 20% of protein, 65% of carbohydrates, and 27% of fat to 30,000 vulnerable students. Average nutritional value provided in distributed sandwich:

·4 Protein: 15 grams (25% of daily protein requirement for children ages 7-14).

·5 Carbohydrates: 85 gram (23% of daily requirement).

·6 Fat: 15 grams (24% of daily requirement).

These achievements represent 25% of daily requirements.

4

School lunch parent-teacher contact groups, which distribute school lunches. 100 parent-teacher contact groups above the baseline (contact groups will include in total at least 200 teachers and 200 parents).

·6 106 parent-teacher contact groups created; 215 parents and 257 school workers or teachers involved.

·7 Four training sessions conducted for all contact groups, providing members basic knowledge and skills for identifying and addressing school needs.

5

Small school lunch grants to participant schools to improve the ability of parent-teacher contact groups to provide meals. Approximately 50 school lunch grants. 132 small grants approved.

Contact groups have identified many grant activities that are not directly linked to the provision of school lunches but significantly improve the school environment.

6

Parent-school councils in schools, targeting schools with a high population of returned refugees. 16 parent-school councils above the baseline. 16 parent-school councils created.

7

Parent-school councils trained in such areas as the role of family in raising children, conflict resolution, needs assessments/ prioritization, project proposal design, and fund raising. 16 parent-school councils trained above baseline. 91% of training sessions conducted (56% of training sessions attended jointly by at least two different parent-school councils).

8

School improvements grants to parent-school councils to improve the learning environment in accordance with council-identified needs. At least 16 school improvement grants above baseline. 30 school improvement grants approved and an additional 40 in preparatory phase; 45% of funding for 30 approved projects spent on infrastructure improvements.

Project Impact

Enrollment: Like other countries in the, Bosnia and Herzegovina emphasizes the importance of education. In fact, in Bosnia and Herzegovina families have a legal obligation to enroll their school-aged children in appropriate educational institutions. Therefore school enrollment statistics do not reflect an increase.

Attendance

Final: Follow-up data collection by CRS confirmed their initial findings of about a 10-% increase in classes attended, with an increase of around 45% in number of students who attend at least a part of the school day, with an average percentage change of 22% increase (21% for females and 23% for males)

Midterm: Preliminary information indicates about a 10-% increase in classes attended, with an increase of around 45% in number of students who attend at least a part of the school day.

Performance: The parent-school councils and contact groups launched successful efforts to improve school facilities, such as playgrounds, kitchen facilities, libraries, and classrooms. Community organizational infrastructure was strengthened through the assistance provided by the GFE project for parent-school councils and contact groups. Productive community relationships between teachers and parents were reinforced through the small grants program.

Special emphasis on girls: No special emphasis on girls was required, as there is not any discrepancy in enrollment between male and female students.

Unanticipated Outcomes

Final:

Bosnia and Herzegovina places a great deal of societal and cultural importance upon education. Education for females is no less a priority for a family than education for males. For this reason, it was not anticipated that Bosnia and Herzegovina’s participation in GFE would produce significant increases in school enrollment. That said, however, CRS did note a dramatic increase in daily attendance of those students enrolled, with an average percentage change of 22% increase (21% for females and 23% for males).

The hard red winter wheat has been immensely popular. Bakery operators have spoken of the high quality of the wheat, and the local populations have developed a taste for products made with it.

USDA commodity shipments for GFE, Food for Progress and other USDA food aid programs arrive in the port of Ploce. It is estimated that 20% of the port’s annual business comes from the arrival of the commodities, and it is believed that the USDA commodity shipments contribute to the maintenance of several hundred jobs.

GFE plays a role in the integration of ethnic groups in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Many of the refugee families returning to their old communities are in transition, and may not be able to provide adequate meals for their children. GFE is of great assistance to these returnee families, and helps assure that the education of children in returnee families does not suffer.

Midterm:

The project contracted 16 local bakeries to provide the meals. The economic activity spawned by the GFE contracts allowed the bakeries to hire additional employees and, in some cases, to expand the range of products they provide to local communities.

The economic effect of the program reached beyond student families and bakeries to include: providers of printed paper and nylon wrappers for the 5 million sandwiches; processors of meat and cheese purchased for sandwich fillings; and local producers of the meat and cheese that was supplied to the processing facilities.

The number of students attending extracurricular activities increased an average of 7% for girls and 9% for boys, compared with comparable periods before the GFE program began. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, such activities have traditionally played an important role in schools and represent an important part of the informal education process. Many students who did not previously receive a school lunch would often leave school earlier because they were too hungry to remain and participate in activities following regular classes.

Lessons Learned

School enrollment and attendance are functions of many variables that are often interrelated in complex ways. Food alone may not yield the desired result. For food to be an effective tool, the project must be designed to address interrelated factors that will be critically important to the success of the program. This includes:

Investing time and expertise in making the program decision-making process truly participatory by including the community stakeholders and beneficiaries.

Allocating sufficient resources to strengthening and empowering the local community’s organizational infrastructure.

Making necessary repairs to physical infrastructure.

Best Practices

Perform a detailed and rigorous situation assessment to ensure that the sociological factors that impact the intended goal of increasing attendance and enrollment are sufficiently understood prior to designing the implementation plan.

Help develop and strengthen parent-school councils and parent-teacher contact groups. In the CRS project, these associations were instrumental in implementing the GFE program, promoting educational enhancement of the school facilities and providing feedback to USDA on ways to improve the impact of the program and reach the most vulnerable students.

Provide small grants, as CRS did, to the parent-school councils and contact groups to repair school facilities, improve or expand facilities, and purchase education materials.

GFE in Action

Final:

The issue of displaced persons and returnees is of great significance in Bosnia and Herzegovina. People displaced by the war are slowly returning to their homes, but they are finding the process difficult because there is little support there. The guarantee of a daily meal is of tremendous assistance in creating a stable environment for children in returnee families. The children are able to better integrate into their new environments and new schools, because they do not feel different from the other pupils, who also receive meals.

A letter from a school pedagogue at OS Enver Colakovic, Breza, states "A number of Roma children have enrolled in school, and we added them to the list of beneficiaries of this program. This has resulted in better school performances and assisted their integration in the regular school. They feel equal to other students, which is very important for the school and the community. Their participation in the program has also resulted in a decrease in potential delinquency of Roma children, which in turn made the work with them easier and decreases the extent to which this population is marginalized and marked as negative. We, as an educational institution, shall support every initiative of this kind, and will participate in its implementation."

Two boys, named Anel and Sanel, attend school at OS Solina, in Tuzla. Although they are a year apart, they attend the same grade, to minimize the cost of their education (in the same classes, they can share books). Their father sells wood chips in order to pay for their education. The children used to miss school to help their father with his work, but since the beginning of the GFE program, their attendance has improved because, as the boys themselves said, "Why would I give up something that belongs to me?" (meaning the school meal).

At OS Gracanica, in Bugojno, all students in the first shift are included in the program, because all of these students are traveling to school by bus. They leave their home early in the morning, often as early as 5:00 am, mostly without having breakfast, and they return as late as 3:30 in the afternoon. Their teachers say, since the beginning of the program, they have noticed that these children stay at school for extra curriculum activities more often, because they are not as hungry, and thus are not as eager to leave. The principal says, "Before this program we did not have something that involves the whole life of the school and the community. Now we do. The atmosphere is completely different now." The school pedagogue said, "There are a lot of undernourished children living in bad hygienic conditions with socially vulnerable families. The program has increased attendance and attracted children to spend more time at school because they are not hungry. We can notice improvement in academic performance, too. Apart from these, there are several other indirect impacts of the program, such as improvement in quality of education, team building among the teachers, improved relationship between the students and teachers in general, as well as developing partnerships with other schools. The impact is stronger in some areas than in others, but the improvement is constant. The Parent Teacher Council is getting stronger and stronger. The parents are more aware of the daily business of the school, and they are taken as equal partners in school project implementation. They participate in needs prioritization. The most important segment of the parental involvement is that the parents become aware that they can influence the school activities."

At OS Desanka Masdimovic, in Prijedor, school officials have noticed that when the children are sick, the parents come to school to retrieve the sandwich and take it to the sick child, so that they do not miss the benefit.

Letter from Ruza Tomic, Pegagog/Psychologist at the School for Children with Mental and Physical Disabilities, Tuzla. "Three are 144 children with mental disabilities, and 22 with combined disabilities (both mental and physical). Most of the children cannot take care of themselves, and are accompanies by parents. 40 children live at the school, and they are children of soldiers killed in the war, war invalids, and those who live far from Tuzla, where the school is located. 36 children are refugees or returnees. Many students are in bad health conditions, and the most frequent are epilepsy, bronchitis, bronchial asthma, heart defects, and a number of them are anemic and are undernourished. Before the GFE program, it was a big problem to provide them with at least one decent meal. It was difficult to keep them focused during class, both because they were hungry and because of their disabilities. The school performance was much lower than their capabilities. The children were tense and nervous, and with more traumas, which was the same with their parents. When the feeding started, the children felt more secure, relieved and cheerful, and the minimal conditions for their development were made. For some children, this is the only meal they have during the day. For the most vulnerable parents who are often disabled themselves, if something remains after the children eat, the leftover food is more than welcome, because they are hungry, too."

Midterm:

Teachers and parents report a reduction in stomachaches and signs of fatigue among pupils as a result of the meal enhancements made possible through GFE.

In addition to the school feeding for 34,122 vulnerable students who participate in the USDA GFE program, the 16 local bakeries that make the sandwiches also benefit. On average, the bakeries have reported an 18% increase in their overall production and a 25% increase in people employed as a result of participation in the GFE program.

Another benefit to bakeries is access to wheat flour from the United States. Hard red winter grain is partial compensation for participation in the program. The ability to obtain high-quality flour is not common in Bosnia and Herzegovina. For economic reasons, bakers buy mostly lower quality flour from Hungary, Croatia, or Yugoslavia. CRS has received many positive reports about the quality of American flour, despite the fact that it is milled locally. This may pave the way for potential markets in the future.


Last modified: Monday, April 14, 2008 06:13:23 PM